Ritter on Harris and Trump

 

Subject: Re: An Election in Two Memes
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 22:21:51 -0600
From: Mark M Giese
To: E


I remember in 2016, a Hillary/Trump debate, and the Q was on nuclear first use.

As I recall, Trump said first use was bad tho by the end of his answer he seemed to perhaps change his mind!

As I recall, Hillary entirely dodged answering the Q.

And Hillary talked at times of war with Russia.

And she got her wish via Biden who's taken us all to the brink of nuclear war.

That Doomsday Clock was moved 10 seconds closer to midnight under Biden than it was under Trump.

And supporting Israel... need I say more?

On 11/5/2024 1:46 PM, E wrote:
Interesting and short. Does not seem to want Harris.

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Scott Ritter Extra <scottritter@substack.com>
To: E
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2024 at 01:27:31 PM CST
Subject: An Election in Two Memes





Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more


There is a one in 14 million chance we can save ourselves—if Ironman and Dr. Strange can be believed. It all comes down to who we vote for today.

America is screwed

We have two choices—Donald Trump and Kamala Harris—who aren’t qualified to be dog catcher, let alone President of the United States.

Neither could run for Mayor in a small town and win, because neither is competent enough to articulate in an informed fashion about issues that matter.

It’s come down to praying for a miraculous outcome.

It reminds me of the scene in Avengers: Infinity War, where Dr. Strange evaluates 14 million possibilities to defeat Thanos, and can only come up with one possibility.

Anytime a nation allows itself to be put in a scenario where it has a one-in-14 million shot at survival, there is a problem.

America, we have a problem.

A vote for Jill Stein opens the slim possibility that the Green Party can break through the 5% threshold that would open up federal funding in the next election, creating the much needed possibility of a viable third party candidacy.

But she is not going to be President under any scenario.

That leaves us with Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.

When I run the numbers on Kamala Harris, the outcome is always dire—the real possibility that America will be in a nuclear conflict sometime during her first year in office.

She has no strategy for ending the conflict in Ukraine beyond continuing the current policy.

She has called Iran the greatest adversary to America today.

She will get America boxed into a corner where the only exit strategy involves the use of nuclear weapons.

Trump is not better.

And yet…

He has articulated about the danger of nuclear war.

Harris has not.

He has talked about ending the Ukraine war.

Harris has not.

He has opined on the possibility of lifting sanctions against Iran.

Harris has not.

Like Dr. Strange, I have run the numbers on a Trump presidency.

It doesn’t look good.

The odds are 14 million to one that Trump keeps us out of a nuclear war.

But as Avengers: Endgame showed us, sometimes, if you fight hard enough, the odds will end in your favor.





Scott will discuss this article and answer audience questions on Ep. 209 of Ask the Inspector.

Comments

Popular Posts